Five Ways Outlook.com Beats Gmail — and One Way it Doesn’t - davisdogried

As you'll reminiscence from last week, Microsoft just took the wraps off Outlook.com, a.k.a. the Webmail Robert William Service formerly known every bit Hotmail.

Yawn, right? After all, what could Outlook.com possibly bring to the table that Gmail doesn't already have — or do better?

As information technology turns unsuccessful, quite an bit. I've exhausted the finale several days tryout-driving the new service, and while it's right from perfect, Outlook.com really offers a number of features that could lure business users away from Gmail.

Present are five areas where I think Outlook.com beats Gmail — and one where, unfortunately, it comes up short.

1. More depot, larger attachments

Gmail gives you 10GB of e-mail storage infinite and limits you to attachments of 25MB or little.

Outlook.com puts no cap on email computer memory and lets you send attachments arsenic epic as 100MB. In fact, if you link up to your SkyDrive account, you can bump busy 300MB attachments.

2. Smarter filtering

Right taboo of the box, Lookout mechanically sorts incoming messages into buckets alike Documents, Photos, and Shipping Updates. One click is all it takes to see all the messages that suffer those criteria.

This feature is named Quick Views, and it's insanely ready to hand. Destined, you fanny accomplish the Lapp thing via Gmail's labels and filters, only this does the act upon for you.

Outlook.com also offers folders, a huge plus for users World Health Organization ne'er a lot cared for Gmail's labels-only system.

3. Better looking

Although Google has made extraordinary strides in improving Gmail's coming into court, it continues to be a cluttered, comfy mint.

Outlook.com, on the other hand, boasts a acuminate, streamlined, visually appealing user interface, with amenities like a reading pane (bottom OR right, your choice) and rollover options like mark as read/unread, delete, and flag.

Scoff if you want, simply it's because Gmail is so aesthetically challenged that I've continued to clutch an literal mail client. Outlook.com is just plain prettier.

4. Better at managing scrap mail

Gmail rocks pretty hard at filtering out junk mail, but Outlook.com appears to experience semisolid spam filters of its personal. Even better, it automatically finds and filters newsletters and gives you the option of unsubscribing — even if the newsletter itself doesn't.

In fact, here's what you'll see in that instance: "We'll postulate BothersomeCompany to take you off their mailing list. If they send anything in the meantime, we'll put it in Junk."

Now that's some conscientious, helpful junk filtering.

5. Smarter with social networks

Email is a social business nowadays, by which I mean it should have meat hooks into your preferred social networks.

Mind-set.com can link with Facebook, LinkedIn, and/OR Chitter. Once you've signed in with any of them, you'll realise your contacts' status updates and other info. Plus, you'll equal healthy to retweet, leave Facebook comments, and thusly on, all from a handy-fop sidebar.

Now for the bad news

Needless to say, Gmail has more or less catching up to do, at least in these areas. But there's one characteristic Expectation.com is sorely deficient, one that will prospective keep in me at arm's duration: no IMAP support.

I consider IMAP essential to all my netmail activities, and it's one area where Gmail truly excels. Here's hoping Microsoft adds that capacity as it continues to polish Outlook's feature set.

Agree? Disagree? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/460453/five_ways_outlook_com_beats_gmail_and_one_way_it_doesnt.html

Posted by: davisdogried.blogspot.com

Share this post